Guidelinehigh evidence

Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.

European heart journal·October 14, 2026·PMID 42870411

Why it matters

Cardiogenic shock mortality remains high despite tMCS advances, and recent trials show divergent outcomes by device and patient phenotype. This consensus provides updated, evidence-based guidance on selecting the right device for the right patient, organizing shock care, and avoiding futile interventions—directly relevant to cardiologists and intensivists managing these complex cases.

Infographic summary of Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
Visual abstract · MedLit

The papers that matter, first.

MedLit ranks the medical literature into a specialty feed with concise summaries, evidence-aware triage, and visual takeaways.

§

MedLit · Evidence, Distilled