Randomized Trialhigh evidence

Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen tube intubation: the DOuble-Lumen intubation with VIdeolaryngoscopy (DOLVI) multicentre randomised trial.

British journal of anaesthesia·July 1, 2026·PMID 42034560

Why it matters

Double-lumen tube placement is technically demanding, and first-attempt success is critical to avoid airway trauma and hypoxemia. This trial provides robust evidence that videolaryngoscopy improves success and reduces complications, supporting its routine use in thoracic anaesthesia.

Infographic summary of Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen tube intubation: the DOuble-Lumen intubation with VIdeolaryngoscopy (DOLVI) multicentre randomised trial.
Visual abstract · MedLit

The papers that matter, first.

MedLit ranks the medical literature into a specialty feed with concise summaries, evidence-aware triage, and visual takeaways.

§

MedLit · Evidence, Distilled